SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 863

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
HONG YIK TRADING – Appellant
Versus
LIZIZ PLANTATION SDN BHD – Respondent


"[29] We have carefully read the written judgment of the learned High Court Judge in instant appeal. Unfortunately we could not find any discussion on the testimony of the witnesses as the probable cause of the defective works that required to be remedied. We find that there is no appreciation or evaluation of the testimony by the respondent's witnesses particularly that of SD3 and SD4 as to why they were engaged to do the remedial work.
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top