COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BONGSOR BINA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SH BUILDERS & MARKETING SDN BHD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] The sole issue to be determined in this appeal is whether, when an action filed in court is stayed under s 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005 ( AA 2005) for the disputes to be referred to arbitration, the computation of limitation period stop at the time when the action is filed in court or ceases when the notice of arbitration is served thereafter?
[2] The issue arose from an action filed by SH Builders & Marketing Sdn Bhd (plaintiff/respondent) against Bongsor Bina Sdn Bhd (defendant/ appellant) at Kuala Lumpur Sessions court via suit No WA-B52(NCvC)-350-08/2019 (the KLSC suit 350). It is an undisputed fact that the cause action was still within the limitation period when the KLSC suit 350 was filed in court, but limitation had set in when the notice of arbitration was served after the court action has been stayed.
[3] For ease of reference, parties will be referred to as they were in the High court, the plaintiff and the defendant.
Facts Of The Case
[4] The relevant background facts of this case have been set out in the Grounds of Decision (the GOD) of the learned High court Judge (the LHCJ) dated 2 December 2022, from which the cu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.