SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 4220 ; 2009 MarsdenLR 1

ALAUDDIN MOHD SHERIFF, ZULKEFLI MAKINUDIN, JAMES FOONG
THAVANANTHAN BALASUBRAMANIAM – Appellant
Versus
MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Zulkefli Makinudin FCJ:

Background

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the High Court at Kuala Lumpur in dismissing the appellant's application to be restored to the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors pursuant to s. 107 of the Legal Profession Act 1976 ("LPA"). The relevant background facts of the case are as follows:

1. On 25 August 1989 the appellant was admitted as an advocate and solicitor to the High Court of Malaya.

2. On 1 December 1989 the appellant joined the Legal and Judicial Service and was appointed as a Magistrate at the Kuala Lumpur Magistrate's Court.

3. The appellant was charged on 28 November 1992 in the Sessions Court for soliciting ("the 1st charge") and for accepting ("the 2nd charge") corrupt money under s. 3(a)(i) and s. 4(a), Prevention of Corruption Act 1961 ("PCA").

4. On 8 March 1993, the Sessions Court discharged and acquitted the appellant of both charges without calling for the defence.

5. The prosecution appealed to the High Court, which affirmed the acquittal and discharge of the appellant in respect of the 1st Charge under s. 3(a)(i), but allowed the prosecution's appeal in respect of the 2nd charge under s. 4(a), P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top