SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 MarsdenLR 232

LEE HUM HOE, CHANG MIN TAT, WAN SULEIMAN
CHIN CHOY – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF STAMP DUTIES – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellants - PS Gill For the respondent - Mokhtar bin Sidin (SFC)

JUDGMENT

Chang Min Tat FJ (delivering the judgment of the Court):

Chia Ah Kow alias Chia Siew Seng, the fourth-named appellant, is one of twenty-three purchasers in a housing-estate who are all dissatisfied with the adjudication of the Collector of Stamp Duties on the amounts of stamp duties to be paid on the transfers to them of the lands and houses built on them. In his case, the record of appeal gives the agreement of purchase, the transfer and the adjudication. The facts in the other cases vary somewhat from his and from one another, but only as to the details of the purchases. The question to be decided is a question of law which is common to all of them. It was and is sufficient merely to refer to the facts in the case of Chia Ah Kow. It would have been sufficient consequently if the appeal record was to consist of documents relating to his case only.

On 30 October 1971 Chia Ah Kow executed an agreement for the purchase of a plot of land, of not less than 1,600 square feet, on which a two-storeyed shop-house was to be erected by the developers, for the inclusive price of $49,000. On 4 July 1973, a transfer of the property agreed to be purchased into the name of Chia Ah Kow w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top