SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 720

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
LIM GIM SEAH – Appellant
Versus
LOKMAN TALIB & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. establishment of contractual relationships and responsibilities. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. negligence findings by the sessions court. (Para 4)
3. arguments regarding control and vicarious liability. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9)
4. legal standards for establishing control and liability in torts. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. judicial reasoning on vicarious liability and control. (Para 13)

[1] From the evidence before the court it appears that Time Telecommunications Sdn Bhd awarded a contract to undertake the construction of manholes, laying of ducts and other related works to the 3rd respondent ('the project'). The 3rd respondent awarded that part of the project involving the installation of fibre optic cables below the highway to the 2nd respondent ('the works'). The works undertaken by the 2nd respondent included undertaking the works along Jalan Kanchut in Alor Setar (the site). The terms of the contract between the 2nd and 3rd respondents can be found from pp 5 to 354 of the 3rd respondent's Core Bundle of Documents Volume 1.

[2] According to the unchallenged evidence of Encik Ghazali bin Mohamad Noor (SP 3), JKR is responsible for the maintainance of the site. It is his evidence that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top