SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 552

HIGH COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
IP SKILL BUILDERS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
HARTASUMA SDN BHD – Respondent


1. Brief Facts

1.1. On or about 30/11/05, M. Saravanan (DW2) requested for a loan from the Plaintiff for the Defendant. DW2 spoke to M. Balakrishnan (PW1) the Managing Director of the Plaintiff, on behalf of K. Ravindran (DW1) the Executive Director of the Defendant and requested for a "short term friendly loan".

1.2. Upon the Defendant signing and forwarding a Letter of Undertaking dated 30/11/05 (Bundle B - pages 1 and 2) addressed to PW1 and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff gave a loan of RM1.5 million to the Defendant to be repaid within 14 working days "from the date of receipt of the full loan".

1.3. The loan was disbursed by the Plaintiff as follows:

(i) RM500.000 paid by cheque into the Defendant's account on 6/12/05.

(ii) RM300.000 paid by telegraphic transfer into the Defendant's account on 7/12/05.

(iii) RM200.000 paid by telegraphic transfer into the Defendant's account on 8/12/05.

(iv) RM500.000 paid by telegraphic transfer into the Defendant's account on 12/12/05.

The loan was to be repaid by 30/12/05.

1.4. The Defendant in paragraph 3 of the Amended Defence admitted receiving the loan of RM1.5 million from the Plaintiff.

1.5. The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendant had failed to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top