INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
KESATUAN KEBANGSAAN WARTAWAN MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
UTUSAN MELAYU (MALAYSIA) BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. collective agreement and payment obligations (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding company profits and bonuses (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 11 , 13) |
| 3. court's interpretation of profits in context (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
[1] This is an application for an order of non-compliance of art. 44 of the collective agreement dated 5 September 2006 between Kesatuan Kebangsaan Wartawan Malaysia (hereinafter referred to as "the union") and Utusan Melayu (M) Bhd (hereinafter referred to as "the respondent"), cognizance number 281/2006 (hereinafter referred to as "the said collective agreement"). The application was made by the union.
[2] The respondent did not pay its employees a bonus of two months wages for 2009. The respondent had given its employees an ex gratia payment of one month wages each for 2009.
[3] Article 44 in its original language read:
Bayaran bonus dua (2) bulan hendaklah merupakan satu ikatan bagi syarikat mengeluarkannya untuk para pekerja tiap-tiap tahun, jika syarikat mendapat keuntungan dalam tahun yang berkenaan.
Submissions By Counsel For The Union
[4] Counsel for the union contended that the respondent had made profits in the fina
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.