SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1838

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
RAHMANI ALI MOHAMAD – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. charge of drug trafficking and initial trial verdicts. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

[1] In the High Court, the second accused, Rahmani Ali Mohamad ("the appellant") was charged and tried together with the first accused, one Ashrafi Ebrahim Hamdollah ("Ebrahim") for the common intention of trafficking in 14,654g of methamphetamine, an offence in contravention of s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (" DDA "), and punishable with mandatory death penalty prescribed under s 39B(2) of the read with s 34 of the Penal Code. Both the appellant and Ebrahim are Iranian nationals.

[2] The offence was said to have been committed on 6 June 2009 at around 4.15pm at kaunter pemeriksaan kastam A, Unit Khas Pemeriksaan Penumpang 1, arrival hall of the main terminal, Kuala Lumpur International Airport ("KLIA"). It was the case of the prosecution that the appellant and Ebrahim were in physical custody and control of two bags, which were later found to contain the impugned drugs.

[3] As it turned out, at the close of the prosecution case, Ebrahim was acquitted of the trafficking charge by learned High Court Judge without his defence being called. No appeal has been filed by the prosecu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top