TUNKU YAACOB HOLDINGS SDN BHD vs PENTADBIR TANAH KEDAH & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2014 MarsdenLR 544

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TUNKU YAACOB HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH KEDAH & ORS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Teo Cheng Wee,SP Tan ,Respondent Advocate: Azmi Ariffin,Fariza Hamzah

Table of Content
1. appeal process initiated for land acquisition review. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3)
2. appellant's involvement in proposed land redevelopment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. notifications regarding land acquisition received. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. preliminary objection raised regarding timeliness of application. (Para 12 , 13)
5. high court dismissed the appellant's application. (Para 14 , 15)
6. determining when the judicial review timeframe begins. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
7. arguments presented by parties. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
8. interpretation of 'communicate' in legal context. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29)
9. significance of statutory language and interpretation needs. (Para 30 , 31)
10. timeliness defined by actual communication timing. (Para 60 , 61 , 62)
11. precedents affecting interpretation of judicial review timeframe. (Para 63 , 64)
12. final order allowing appeal and remitting case to high court. (Para 68)

[1] The appellant in the present appeal before us, was the applicant in the High Court who had filed an ex parte application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings to quash the decision of the State Authority in having compulsorily acquired two parcels of l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2014 MarsdenLR 544

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYATUNKU YAACOB HOLDINGS SDN BHD – AppellantVersusPENTADBIR TANAH KEDAH & ORS – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TUNKU YAACOB HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH KEDAH & ORS – Respondent