FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
DATO SEE TEOW CHUAN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. commencement of winding up and initial reactions from contributories. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. legal proceedings for alleged malfeasance and review for plagiarism. (Para 7 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
[1] On 30 January 1996, by consent, the High Court ordered that Kian Joo Holdings Sdn Bhd (the company) be wound up pursuant to s 218(f) and (i) of the Companies Act 1965 .
[2] At the same time, one Abdul Jabbar bin Abdul Majid and Ng Kim Tuck from KPMG Peat Marwick were appointed as the joint and several liquidators of the company. On 2 October 2007, one Ooi Woon Chee from the same firm was appointed as one of the liquidators to replace Abdul Jabbar bin Abdul Majid.
[3] At the meeting of contributories on 10 July 2008, the majority contributories (representing 52% in value of the companys equity) were in favour of selling of the entire shares of the company, while the remaining contributories (being minority contributories holding 48% in value of the equity) preferred distribution of the shares in specie.
[4] On 23 February 2009, the liquidators entered into a conditional shares sale agreement for the sale of 146,131,500 shares in question to Can-One International Sdn Bhd. The contr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.