2015 MarsdenLR 1802
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
AL BAIK FAST FOOD DISTRIBUTION CO SAE – Appellant
Versus
EL BAIK FOOD SYSTEMS CO SA – Respondent
[Originating Summons No: 24IP-38-12-2014]
The court determined that the defendant's trade marks were subject to expungement for non-use under the Trade Marks Act 1976, as actual use in Malaysia was absent.
Headnote:This case concerns an application under Section 46(1)(a) and (b) of the Trade Marks Act 1976 (TMA 1976) to rectify the trade marks register by expunging the defendant's trademarks due to non-use. The court found that the plaintiff was an aggrieved person under TMA 1976 based on their valid trademark registration and usage in Malaysia, and concluded that the defendant had not used their trademark in good faith for the statutory period. The court thereby allowed the plaintiff's application for expungement.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for trademark expungement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. plaintiff's background and registration. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 10) |
[1] Enclosure (1) is the plaintiff's application under s 46(1)(a) and/or (b) Trade Marks Act 1976 (" TMA 1976") to rectify the trade marks register by removing and/or cancelling the defendant's trade mark registrations, which are as follows:
[2] The grounds of the application are as follows:
(i) The plaintiff is an aggrieved person as stipulated under the TMA 1976;
(ii) Aside from the defendant's marks being registered in Malaysia in bad faith, the defendant did not initiate any use of the "AL BAIK" trade mark in good faith or at all with any of the defendant's malaysian registrations in respect of any goods or services that have been registered in Malaysia at all material times, contrary to s 46(1)(a) of the TMA ; and/or
(iii) Contrary to s 46(1)(b) of the TMA , the defendant has not used the mark in question for a continuous period of not less than three years plus one month in relation to the registered goods or services.
[3] After hearing the parties, the plaintiff's application was allowed with costs.
The Salient Facts
[4] The plaintiff is a company based in Egypt and has registered its trade mark in Egypt and has operated its restaurant business under the "AL BAIK" trade mark in Egypt since 2000. The plaintiff had since expanded its business in the Middle East and Asia. The plaintiff has also registered the said mark in Kenya, South Africa, India, China, Iran and Ethiopia.
[5] The plaintiff created the using the word "AL BAIK", with a smiling chicken wearing a "tarboush", a traditional head cover commonly used in Egypt. The mark also includes the chicken device performing a "welcoming salute" by raising the tarboush.
[6] The plaintiff filed its trade mark application in Malaysia in Class 29 and 16 and the same has been registered since 2005.
[7] Since early 2014, the plaintiff has been using its trade mark in fast food restaurants in Jalan Bukit Bintang and Setapak, Kuala Lumpur and in Shah Alam.
[8] The defendant is a company based in Saudi Arabia and started its food and restaurant business in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in 1970. The defendant also has restaurants in Makkah Al Mukarama and Al Medina Al Munawarah, the holy lands where pilgrims from all over the world go for their pilgrimage.
[9] The defendant has registered its trade mark in Saudi Arabia in 1987 and have since expanded to other countries including Europe and the United States of America.
[10] In Malaysia, the defendant has registered its trade mark in 1997. Details of the defendant's registered trade marks in Malaysia are as follows:
[11] The defendant had initiated the Originating Summons No: 24IP-17- 04-2014 against the plaintiff in order to expunge the plaintiff's trade marks pursuant to s 45 of the TMA 1976. The said claim was allowed by this court.