SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 1983

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
GREEN CRESCENT RESOURCES – Appellant
Versus
CHING MIEW YOKE & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. validity of the contra-arrangement. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6 , 7 , 10)
2. criteria for the enforceability of agreements. (Para 11 , 44)
3. consideration of the corporate veil in contractual obligations. (Para 33 , 39 , 46 , 59)
Nallini Pathmanathan JCA:

Introduction

[1] The primary issue that arose for consideration in this appeal was whether a debt due and owing by the main contractor of a mixed development project, one HAC Builders Sdn Bhd, the second defendant in the court below ('HAC Builders') to its sub-contractors, Qudotech Sdn Bhd, the 3rd plaintiff in the court below ('Qudotech') and Fei Wong Letrik Sdn Bhd, the 2nd plaintiff in the court below ('Fei Wong Letrik') was effectively set-off or settled by virtue of a 'contra-arrangement' whereby HAC Builders agreed to give Qudotech four units in the mixed development in return for the extinguishment or settlement of the debt.

[2] Pursuant to this 'contra-arrangement' a unit, namely Unit A-3-1B was allegedly 'given' to Qudotech in settlement of the sum of RM97,845.29. Qudotech in turn nominated Ching Miew Yoke, the 1st plaintiff in the court below ('the purchaser') as the beneficiary of Unit A-3-1B.

[3] Notwithstanding t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top