COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. assessment of duty of care in negligence claims. (Para 1 , 8 , 11) |
| 2. legal arguments concerning the responsibility of the defendants. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. determination of causation and foreseeability of damages. (Para 15 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 57 , 59) |
Introduction
[1] This appeal is against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner ('JC') of the High Court in dismissing the appellant's claim for damages against the 1st and 2nd respondents for negligence and for breach of contract against the 2nd respondent. For convenience, the parties shall be referred to as they were in the High Court.
[2] We heard the appeal on 11 March 2015. After hearing the parties, we adjourned the matter for our consideration and decision. We now deliver our decision and the reasons for the same.
Background Facts
[3] The plaintiff operates a factory in Tanjong Malim, Perak producing calcium silicate bricks.
[4] Pursuant to a supply of electricity contract dated 1 March 1996 ("the supply contract"), the 2nd defendant, Tenaga Nasional Berhad, supplies electricity to the plaintiff. Prior to the supply contract, as required by the 2nd defendant, the plaintiff constructed a power
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.