SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 MarsdenLR 2086

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BATU KEMAS INDUSTRI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ANOR – Respondent


Table of Content
1. assessment of duty of care in negligence claims. (Para 1 , 8 , 11)
2. legal arguments concerning the responsibility of the defendants. (Para 10 , 12 , 14)
3. determination of causation and foreseeability of damages. (Para 15 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 57 , 59)
Vernon Ong JCA:

Introduction

[1] This appeal is against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner ('JC') of the High Court in dismissing the appellant's claim for damages against the 1st and 2nd respondents for negligence and for breach of contract against the 2nd respondent. For convenience, the parties shall be referred to as they were in the High Court.

[2] We heard the appeal on 11 March 2015. After hearing the parties, we adjourned the matter for our consideration and decision. We now deliver our decision and the reasons for the same.

Background Facts

[3] The plaintiff operates a factory in Tanjong Malim, Perak producing calcium silicate bricks.

[4] Pursuant to a supply of electricity contract dated 1 March 1996 ("the supply contract"), the 2nd defendant, Tenaga Nasional Berhad, supplies electricity to the plaintiff. Prior to the supply contract, as required by the 2nd defendant, the plaintiff constructed a power

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top