SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 2209

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TEOH KIM HENG – Appellant
Versus
TAN ONG BAN – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court's reasoning on purchaser's rights and validity of agreements. (Para 12)

[12] We have perused the appeal records and considered the submissions made by both parties. Having considered the evidence before us, we agreed with learned counsel for the appellant that, on the evidence, the appellant is a bona fide purchaser for value. We therefore allowed the appellant's appeal. The judgment of the High COURT in respect of the appellant is set aside. We award costs of RM20,000.00 here and below. The deposit was ordered to be refunded. We give our reasons below.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top