SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 611

HIGH COURT, MUAR
METROD (MALAYSIA) BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MGS TRANSPORT SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. robbery during transportation and insurance claims (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. locus standi and contractual relationships (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. interpretation of the transportation contract (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
A. THE APPLICATION:

1. The Defendant applied (in enclosure (5)) under the Court's existing jurisdiction and or under Order 18 rule 19(1)(b) or (c) or (d) of the Rules of the High 1980 (" RHC ") to strike off the Plaintiff's Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim dated 29.4.2009 (in enclosure (2)).

2. The grounds of the Application are that the Plaintiffs claim is scandalous, frivolous or vexatious; or an abuse of the process of the Court, and therefore should be struck off.

B. BRIEF FACTS:-

3. It was the contention of the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff, together with Metrod (OFHC) Sdn Bhd. ("Metrod OFHC"), had used the services of the Defendant for the transportation of goods, namely copper wires, belonging to both the Plaintiff and Metrod OFHC. This arrangement was as provided in the Transportation Contract dated 16.3.2001 in Exhibit "TCH-1" of the Afidavit in support of the Defendant's application affirmed by Teh Chin Hua on 3.6.2009 in enclosure 5A ("Transpor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top