Back
FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
CHONG FOOK SIN – Appellant
Versus
AMANAH RAYA BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initial appeal procedures and background (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. grounds for the appeal against coa's decision (Para 6 , 18 , 20) |
| 3. factual background of the case (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's findings on the intervention application (Para 19 , 39) |
| 5. legal principles guiding intervener applications (Para 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36) |
| 6. scope of legal interest in intervention (Para 22 , 33) |
Introduction
[1] Appeals No: 02()-36-2009(W), 02()-37-2009(W) and 02()-38-2009(W) were all set for hearing before us on 18 May 2010.
[2] Upon the request of the parties concerned, we proceeded to hear appeal No: 02()-37-2009(W) only. It was also agreed by all parties concerned that the result of this appeal would bind the other two appeals.
[3] The appeal is against the decision of the Court of Appeal (COA) dated 8 May 2009 (the "decision") by which the COA allowed the application by the 2nd to 6th respondents (the "interveners") to intervene (the "intervener application") into the COA Civil Appeal Number W-02-432-2004. The application to intervene was made in the Appeal.
[4] Leave to appeal was gr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
