SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 1869

COURT OF APPEAL ENGLAND AND WALES
QUINN DIRECT INSURANCE LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE LAW SOCIETY OF ENGLAND AND WALES – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of the law firm and claims against it (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. request for document access related to claims (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. overview of the regulatory framework for solicitors (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
4. arguments regarding document access by the insurer (Para 15 , 16 , 19)
5. court's rulings on privilege and document disclosure (Para 21 , 22 , 25 , 29)
6. final ruling dismissing the appeal (Para 30 , 31)
JUDGMENT

The Chancellor:

Introduction

[1] Mr Onobrakpeya, a conveyancer, and Mr Ikoku, an immigration law specialist, carried on business as solicitors in partnership in the name of South Bank Solicitors ("SBS") from, at the latest, 01 December 2005. On 20 November 2006 Investigation Officers of the defendant ("the Law Society" including where necessary references to the Solicitors Regulation Authority) inspected the books and accounts of SBS and concluded that they did not comply with the Solicitors' Accounts Rules Accordingly on 09 January 2007 the partners were interviewed by the Investigation Officers. Such officers reported their findings to the Law Society on 26 February 2007. On 29 June 2007 the Law Society commenced disciplinary proceedings against M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top