INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
ARUN KUMAR BAG – Appellant
Versus
HOSPITAL PANTAI INDAH SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the claimant's employment. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on whether the claimant was dismissed unjustly. (Para 9 , 10 , 29) |
| 3. legal definitions and interpretations of workmen under the act. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 19 , 35 , 36) |
| 4. court's findings on the claimant's employment status. (Para 37 , 44 , 50) |
[1] This is a reference by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources made under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 regarding the dismissal of Arun Kumar Bag ("the claimant") by Hospital Pantai Indah Sdn Bhd ("the company") on 28 February 2006.
Background Facts
[2] The company operates a private hospital known as Hospital Pantai Indah ("the hospital"). The claimant in response to the advertisement of the company for, inter alia, full time Resident Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist applied for a job with the company which was then about to set up the hospital. At the interviews, the claimant was told that he had to cease his private practice in his private clinic and be a full time Resident Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist in the hospital. After the interviews, the claimant was given two
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.