SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2670

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
STRONPAC CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
VAST CONSORTIUM SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Justin Voon,KF Wong,Azmi Abdoll Aziz ,Respondent Advocate: Jason Ng Kau,Khong Zhi Jian,Tan Keng Soon

Table of Content
1. introduction of case and basis for appeal. (Para 1)
Hasnah Mohammed Hashim JCA:

[1] The appeal before us was against the decision of the learned High Court Judge in Seremban High Court allowing the respondent's (the plaintiff in the High Court) claim. We had, after perusing the Records of Appeal and considering the written and oral submissions of learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent, unanimously allowed the appeal with costs of RM50,000.00 for here and below and we allowed the counterclaim with costs of RM10,000.00. We set aside the order of the High Court. We further ordered that the deposit be refunded. Our reasons appear below.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top