SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2150

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LEE TIOW KEE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
NG GEOK HWA – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background and grounds for the appeal are provided. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. significant points are made regarding the computation date of damages. (Para 4)
3. court discussion on the legal principles guiding review on concurrent findings. (Para 5)

[1] This appeal was against the decision of the learned High Court Judge given on 19 October 2015 in affirming the award of damages made by the Senior Assistant Registrar (SAR) in the sum of RM9,770,139.50 to the respondent as damages in lieu of specific performance of a Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA), pursuant to the Court of Appeal order dated 11 December 2013.

[2] After pursuing the Records of Appeal and having heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, oral as well as written, we allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the High Court affirming the order of the SAR on the assessment of damages. We now set out our reasons for so doing.

Background

[3] The subject matter of the SPA was an undivided piece of freehold land in Seremban, held under Grant No. 67284 Lot No 1006, Mukim Seremban, Negeri Sembilan (the land); jointly owned in 2007 by the appellants. On 24 May 2007, the appell

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top