COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LEE TIOW KEE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
NG GEOK HWA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and grounds for the appeal are provided. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. significant points are made regarding the computation date of damages. (Para 4) |
| 3. court discussion on the legal principles guiding review on concurrent findings. (Para 5) |
[1] This appeal was against the decision of the learned High Court Judge given on 19 October 2015 in affirming the award of damages made by the Senior Assistant Registrar (SAR) in the sum of RM9,770,139.50 to the respondent as damages in lieu of specific performance of a Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA), pursuant to the Court of Appeal order dated 11 December 2013.
[2] After pursuing the Records of Appeal and having heard and considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, oral as well as written, we allowed the appeal and set aside the order of the High Court affirming the order of the SAR on the assessment of damages. We now set out our reasons for so doing.
Background
[3] The subject matter of the SPA was an undivided piece of freehold land in Seremban, held under Grant No. 67284 Lot No 1006, Mukim Seremban, Negeri Sembilan (the land); jointly owned in 2007 by the appellants. On 24 May 2007, the appell
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.