SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 284

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TEKITAL SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
SARINA KAMALUDIN & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's investment and claims (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. plaintiff's investment and initial agreements with api. (Para 3)
3. plaintiff alleges siphoning of assets (Para 8 , 30)
4. defendants deny conspiracy and maintain legal actions are legitimate (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. conspiracy and unlawful siphoning of api's assets. (Para 10)
6. witness testimonies regarding corporate actions and agreements. (Para 14 , 16 , 37 , 67)
7. evidence of control and operations by defendants (Para 36 , 59)

[1] The plaintiff, Tekital Sdn Bhd, which is a company incorporated in Malaysia by two Italian nationals, namely one Carlo Allaria and one Penna Luciana, brings this action against the six defendants claiming that these defendants conspired to injure them, and perpetrated a fraud against them. In essence the plaintiff invested in a company known as Auto Parking Inc Sdn Bhd ('API') which is now in liquidation. API, a private limited company, was at all material times involved in the car park business, i.e. it conducted the business of operating and managing car parks. The plaintiff maintains that it made such investment premised on various misrepresentations made to Carlo Allaria

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top