SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 2952

MAGISTRATE COURT KUALA LUMPUR
T-ONE MOTOR WORKS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
YAP PUI HAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Norhanum Hassan M:

Introduction

[1] This is an application by the Plaintiff, T-One Motor Works Sdn Bhd, under O 14 of the Rules of 2012, seeking summary judgment against the Defendant, Yap Pui Har. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant has no valid defence, and the matter does not warrant a full trial.

[2] The claims involve two sums: RM72,500.00 paid via cheques for services allegedly not provided and RM1,409.00 transferred via DuitNow for a phone purchase that still needs to be completed. The Defendant denies liability, asserting that these payments were connected to a third party, Yap Chee Ming.

Background

[3] The Plaintiff claims that RM72,500.00 was paid to the Defendant over a defined period for services under an implied contractual arrangement. However, the Defendant allegedly failed to render any services, constituting a total failure of consideration. The Plaintiff further claims that RM1,409.00 was transferred for purchasing a company phone, which the Defendant neither procured nor refunded, amounting to unjust enrichment.

[4] The Defendant acknowledges receipt of both sums but disputes the Plaintiff's assertions, contending that the payments were linked to a third


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top