SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 MarsdenLR 134

FEDERAL COURT IPOH
NASRI – Appellant
Versus
MESAH – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:A Mahendran ,Respondent Advocate: R Ponnudurai

JUDGMENT

Gill FJ:

1

[1] This is an appeal against the dismissal by Chang Min Tat J of the appellant's action in the High Court at Ipoh, in which he claimed for specific performance of an agreement dated the 5th day of June, 1947 whereby the respondent had agreed to sell to him her land held under Entry Mukim Register No 3400 for lot No 3970 in the Mukim of Sabak in the district of Sabak Bernam. The action was dismissed on the ground that it was barred by limitation.

[2] The facts of the case as set out in the plaintiff's statement of claim are as follows. The plaintiff paid to the defendant the agreed purchase price of $1,000 on the date of the agreement, and the defendant on the same day handed to the plaintiff the issue document of title in respect of the said land. No document of transfer was executed as it would not have been possible to have it registered because of the moratorium then in force, but the defendant undertook to execute a valid and registrable transfer of the land in favour of the plaintiff when the moratorium was lifted. The plaintiff went into occupation of the land, built a plank house with zinc roof thereon and has lived there with his family ever since and paid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top