SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 MarsdenLR 1611

AUGUSTINE PAUL
PP – Appellant
Versus
IRAN SAKDON – Respondent


Advocates:
For the prosecution - Anslem Charles Fernandis, DPPAccused in personReported by Mariette Peters-Goh

JUDGMENT

Augustine Paul J:

The charge preferred against the accused in the Magistrates Court at Melaka was for being in possession of 0.10 grams of morphine on 25 July 1997 in contravention of s. 12(2) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 and punishable with a fine not exceeding twenty thousand ringgit or imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years or both.

The accused pleaded guilty to the charge when it was read and explained to him. He understood the nature and consequences of his plea. He admitted the facts of the case as presented by the prosecution and the learned magistrate accepted his guilty plea. In his plea in mitigation the accused prayed for leniency in view of his plea. He had 22 previous convictions. The first was in 1973 and the last in 1994. Seven of the previous convictions were drug related while most of the remaining ones were for theft. The last conviction on 3 December 1994 was for possession of dangerous drugs for which he was sentenced to 36 months' imprisonment. Accordingly, the prosecution prayed for a deterrent sentence as the previous convictions did not seem to have had any effect on him. The learned magistrate convicted the accused and imposed a sente

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top