SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 MarsdenLR 1275

HIGH COURT JOHOR BAHRU
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Appellant
Versus
AMIR BIN MAHMOOD & 2 ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J

Amir bin Mahmood ('the first accused') was jointly charged on the following amended charge with that of Mohd Zahar bin Nor ('the second accused'):

Bahawa kamu pada 22 Julai 1994 jam lebih kurang 11.20 malam di tempat letak kereta, Lapangan Terbang Sultan Ismail, Senai, Johor Bahru, dalam Negeri Johor, bagi mencapai niat bersama kamu semua, telah didapati mengedar dadah berbahaya iaitu 1,835.7g cannabis dan dengan itu kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952, dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama dibaca bersama-sama dengan s 34 Kanun Kesiksaan (FMS Cap 45).

Kamsan bin Bujamin (the third accused and for the purpose of this judgment he will be referred to as 'John') was charged on the following amended charge:

Bahawa kamu pada 22 Julai 1994 jam lebih kurang 11.20 malam di tempat letak kereta, Lapangan Terbang Sultan Ismail, Senai, Johor Bahru, dalam Negeri Johor, telah didapati melakukan persediaan untuk tujuan memperedarkan dadah berbahaya, iaitu 1,835.7g cannabis dan dengan itu kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(c) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952, dan boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top