SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 MarsdenLR 1325

HIGH COURT, SIBU
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Appellant
Versus
CHEW KUOK LEH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This is an appeal by the Public Prosecutor. against the decision of the learned magistrate given on 26 May 1997 whereby the respondent who was changed for an offence under section 56(1)(d) of the Immigration Act 1959/63 was acquitted and discharged.

At the commencement of the hearing of the appeal the learned counsel for the respondent raised a preliminary objection. It was submitted that the respondent was not served with the notice of appeal, the petition of appeal and the notes of proceedings. It was further submitted that the appellant should serve the notice of appeal, petition of appeal containing the grounds of appeal and the notes of evidence on the respondent or his counsel before the appeal can be set down for hearing. In this case it is definitely against natural justice that the respondent was not given the legal right to know the [2] grounds of appeal. The respondent was not given the opportunity to prepare his case and is deprived of his legal right to contest the appeal. So it was submitted that the appeal should be dismissed.

The learned Deputy Public Prosecutor ("the DPP") submitted that they have complied with section 307 of the Criminal Procedure Code ("the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top