SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1835

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
JIGARLAL KANTILAL DOSHI – Appellant
Versus
AMANAH RAYA BERHAD & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual chronology of business and estate (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments on locus standi and authority (Para 11 , 14 , 15)
3. court's analysis on legal standing (Para 12 , 13 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

[1] In 1966, the appellant Jigarlal Kantilal Doshi's father, one Kantilal Prabhulal Doshi ("the father"), who died on 1 July 1991, started a manufacturing business. The appellant began working for his father in the business at the age of 17 while his brothers, Tilaklal Kantilal Doshi and Jogesh Kantilal Doshi were sent overseas for studies.

[2] The business was incorporated as Overseas Industries Sdn Bhd on 31 December 1969 ("the company"). In 1970, the father caused to be issued 347 shares in the company to the appellant and 500 shares to the appellant's mother, Damayanti Kantilal Doshi ("the mother"). In 1973, the father caused a further 1,128 shares in the company to be transferred from the uncle who was holding it in trust for the appellant's father, to the appellant. In 1987, the father directed the mother's 500 shares to be transferred to himself. Three months before he died he made a will ("the will") as to the disposal of his est

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top