SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 MarsdenLR 2373 ; 2005 MarsdenLR 1

GOPAL SRI RAM, ARIFFIN JAKA, ABDUL WAHAB PATAIL
KHAW CHENG POON – Appellant
Versus
KHAW CHENG BOK – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellants - Lim Chee Wee (Harold Tan with him); M/s Skrine
For the 1st respondent - N Chandran (E Ramasamy, Rajan Chandran, Roy Etican & Ivan Ang with him); M/s E Ramasamy & Co
For the 2nd-5th, 9th-13th respondents - John Khoo Boo Lai (Mohd Ismail Mohamed with him); M/s Ismail Khoo & Assoc
For the 6th-8th respondents - R Shyamala Devi; M/s Hussein & Co
For the 14th-16th respondents - JA Yeoh; M/s Shearn Delamore & Co
(Civil Appeal No: P-02-409-1998)
For the appellants - JA Yeoh; M/s Shearn Delamore & Co
For the 1st respondent - N Chandran (E Ramasamy, Rajan Chandran, Roy Etican & Ivan Ang with him); M/s Ramasamy & Co
For the 2nd-5th, 9th-13th respondents - John Khoo Boo Lai (Mohd Ismail Mohamed with him); M/s Ismail Khoo & Assoc
For the 6th-8th respondents - R Shyamala Devi; M/s Hussein & Co
For the 14th-16th respondents - Lim Chee Wee (Harold Tan with him); M/s Skrine

JUDGEMENT

(Oral)

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

This is the judgment of the court.

Background And Issues

There are two appeals before us, they both arise from 3 consolidated suits tried at the High Court in Penang. The litigation in these appeals has to do with the estate of the late Datuk Khaw Bian Cheng. The subject matter of the appeals concerns 2 sets of wills, one set of 3 made on 24 October 1990, which we will refer to as the "1990 Wills" and another set of 3 wills made on 3 August 1992, which we will refer to as "1992 Wills".

The appellants before us in the first appeal, Appeal No.: P-02-360-98, were the defendants in all 3 suits. The respondents before us were the plaintiffs in those suits. The appellants in the second appeal Appeal No.: P-02-409-98 intervened in one of those suits, had themselves added as defendants and delivered a counterclaim about which we will say something in a moment. Suffice that we mention now that the appellants in the second appeal are seeking an order that Datuk Khaw Bian Cheng (the deceased) died intestate. In other words, they are seeking to have both the 1990 and the 1992 Wills declared invalid.

In the court below, the learned judge held the 1990 Wills t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top