HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MELVANI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
[1] The appellant was charged with 2 others of having committed the offence of having in their joint possession about $10,000 worth of US currency knowing the same to be counterfeit and intending to use them as genuine. All three pleaded guilty and the trial judge in accepting their pleas sentenced the other two accused to a term of imprisonment for two years but sentenced the appellant to imprisonment for a term of three years, the trial judge distinguishing his case on the ground that he was the main culprit and also because he had tried to mislead the court by informing the court through his counsel that the counterfeits were so well done as to be hardly distinguishable from genuine notes of the same denominations.
[2] Before me, through his counsel, he has appealed against the sentence on the grounds that the trial judge ought to have taken his plea of guilty as a mitigating factor and ought not to have imported the trial judge's own view that the counterfeit notes were so badly made as to be obvious to the trial judge and therefore obvious to the appellant who had considerable experience in dealing with tourists and therefore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.