SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 MarsdenLR 49

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
MELVANI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Dato' David Marshall,JG Advani ,Respondent Advocate: Isaac Paul Ratnam

JUDGMENT

Wee Chong Jin CJ (delivering oral judgment):

[1] The appellant was charged with 2 others of having committed the offence of having in their joint possession about $10,000 worth of US currency knowing the same to be counterfeit and intending to use them as genuine. All three pleaded guilty and the trial judge in accepting their pleas sentenced the other two accused to a term of imprisonment for two years but sentenced the appellant to imprisonment for a term of three years, the trial judge distinguishing his case on the ground that he was the main culprit and also because he had tried to mislead the court by informing the court through his counsel that the counterfeits were so well done as to be hardly distinguishable from genuine notes of the same denominations.

9

[2] Before me, through his counsel, he has appealed against the sentence on the grounds that the trial judge ought to have taken his plea of guilty as a mitigating factor and ought not to have imported the trial judge's own view that the counterfeit notes were so badly made as to be obvious to the trial judge and therefore obvious to the appellant who had considerable experience in dealing with tourists and therefore

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top