SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 MarsdenLR 1482

CHAO HICK TIN
RE GEE HOE CHAN TRADING CO PTE LTD – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
David Yeow ( Walter Woon and Wilson Wong with him) for the petitioners.
Cheong Yuen Hee ( Ng Cher Yeow with him) for the respondents.

JUDGMENTBY: CHAO HICK TIN J

This was an application by certain shareholders for reliefs under s 216 of the Companies Act (Cap 50, 1990 Ed) (the Act). At the conclusion of the hearing I was satisfied that a case was made out and I ordered that the company be wound up. I now give my reasons.

Gee Hoe Chan Trading Co Pte Ltd, hereinafter called the company, was incorporated as a private limited company on 20 December 1960. At the time of the filing of the petition for relief, the main line of business of the company was as commission agent and in investment in real property.

Before the incorporation of the company, there was a partnership business established by one Ng Ah Kim and another Ng Boon Hong. Ng Boon Hong died in 1952. After his death, his interest in the partnership was retained by his widow, Madam Tan Ah Huan (fourth petitioner herein) and his children, Ng Kim Kee, Ng Kim Ming, Ng Kin Yeow and Ng King Leang (the fifth to eighth petitioners herein) and the partnership business was managed entirely by Ng Ah Kim. On the incorporation of the company in 1960, Madam Tan Ah Huan and her children were made shareholders. She was also made a director.

Ng Ah Kim died in 1976. Bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top