SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 MarsdenLR 945

LEE HUN HOE, SEAH, HASHIM YEOP A SANI
SIVANESAN – Appellant
Versus
SHYMALA – Respondent


Advocates:
CH Liew for the appellant.
G Joseph for the respondent.

JUDGMENTBY: LEE HUN HOE CJ (BORNEO)

(delivering the Judgment of the Court): We allowed the appeal and set aside the decree nisi. We stated that we would give our reasons later and we do so now. The appeal is concerned with the dissolution of marriage on ground of mutual consent under section 52 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). The section provides:

"52. If husband and wife mutually agree that their marriage should be

dissolved they may after the expiration of two years from the

date of their marriage present a joint petition accordingly and

the court may, if it thinks fit, make a decree of divorce on

being satisfied that both parties freely consent, and that proper

provision is made for the wife and for the support, care and

custody of the children, if any, of the marriage, and may attach

such conditions to the decree of divorce as it thinks fit."

Sivanesan, the petitioner (husband) and Shyamala, the co-petitioner (wife) were married on August 24, 1974 at the Petaling Jaya Marriage Registry. While the husband lived in Petaling Jaya

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top