SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 MarsdenLR 113

SUPREME COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
PHUA CHIN CHEW & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KM & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

IN THE HIGH COURT:

Eusoff Chin J

The first plaintiff was a government school teacher. The second and third plaintiffs are the Committee members acting for, and managing the affairs and well being of the first plaintiff vide Order of the Muar High COURT in Originating Summons No. 69 of 1982, because the first plaintiff is a mental patient.

According to the Statement of Claim of the plaintiffs and the affidavit filed by their solicitor to oppose the application to strike out the suit, the 1st. plaintiff started work as a teacher on January 2, 1971. He was given medical leave from September 5, 1976, to November 11, 1976. On November 15, 1976, his illness was traced to psychiatric causes and he was admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of the University Hospital Kuala Lumpur till December 9, 1976. He was again admitted to the Psychiatric Ward of the same hospital from April 15, 1977, to May 12, 1977.

On February 1, 1977, on the recommendation of Professor Teoh Jin Yin of the Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University Malaya, that the first plaintiff was suffering from mental disorder, the first plaintiff was transferred from Sekolah Tinggi, Muar, to Sekolah Me

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top