SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 MarsdenLR 219

OCJ KUALA LUMPUR
V SINNATHAMBOO – Appellant
Versus
MINISTER FOR LABOUR AND MANPOWER – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mohamed Azmi J:

This was an application by Vincent Sinnathamboo for an order of certiorari to remove into this court for the purpose of it being quashed the order dated May 5, 1976 by the Director-General for Industrial Relations acting on behalf of the Minister for Labour and Manpower. When I dismissed the application with costs on March 16, 1978, I indicated to counsel that I would give my reasons later. I now proceed to do so. In this case, three grounds were given in the applicant's statement, viz.:-

(a) That the Director-General for Industrial Relations acting on behalf of the Minister for Labour and Manpower was wrong in law in holding that the applicant did not appeal to the Director-General of Industrial Relations within a month of his dismissal as required under the provisions of the Industrial Relations Act, 1967.

(b) That the Director-General for Industrial Relations acting on behalf of the Minister for Labour and Manpower acted in excess of jurisdiction when he held that Universal Cars was the applicant's employer.

(c) That the Director-General for Industrial Relations acting on behalf of the Minister of Labour and Manpower acted against the principle of natural

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top