SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 4590 ; 2008 MarsdenLR 1

GOPAL SRI RAM, HELILIAH MOHD YUSOF, AHMAD MAAROP
SV BEVERAGES HOLDINGS SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
KICKAPOO (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ahmad Maarop JCA:

Brief Facts Of The Case

[1] This appeal concerns the rights to produce, distribute and sell in Malaysia the soft drinks - Kickapoo. The brief facts relevant to this appeal are these. Pursuant to a licence agreement dated 9 January 1996 (the RL agreement), the Monarch Company, Inc (TMCI), of 1100 Johnson Ferry Road, N.E Suite 460, Georgia 30342, the United States of America, as the owner of the trade marks "Kickapoo", and certain designs all for use in connection with the finished beverages, bases and concentrates, granted an exclusive licence to the respondent to prepare, sell and distribute in bottles and cans the finished beverages (the said beverages) in Malaysia and Singapore. Under the RL agreement, the respondent did not acquire any rights to the Kickapoo trade mark except the right to use in accordance with the agreement, and that all use thereof by the respondent shall enure to the benefit of TMCI. With effect from 9 July 1985, TMCI was registered under the Malaysian Trade Marks Act 1976 as the proprietor of the trade mark relating to the said beverages. An essential ingredient of the said beverages was the base concentrate which, under the RL agr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top