SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 MarsdenLR 748

V.C.GEORGE
SYKT.PAKAR KAYU & PERDAGANGAN SDN.BHD. – Appellant
Versus
MAA-SK SDN.BHD. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the plaintiffs - J. Indran; M/s. Mah-Kok & Din
For the defendants - Shakuntala Sharma; M/s. Sharma & Jaafar

JUDGMENT

VC George J:

Paragraph 3 of the statement of claim is as follows:

3. The Plaintiff's claim against the defendant is for the sum of RM129,353.90 being the balance price for goods sold and delivered to the defendant at the defendant's request and the sum of RM32,967.45 being the accrued interest as at 30 June 1983.

Particulars

Principal sum RM220,323.86

Less:

Payment in November 1982 RM30,000

Payment in February 1983 RM40,000

Rebate by mutual agreement RM20,969.96

RM 90,969.96

RM129,353.90

Interest accrued thereon as at 30 June 1983 RM 32,967.45

This paragraph was dealt with by the defendants in the statement of defence filed as follows:

3. Paragraph 3 of the statement of claim is denied and the plaintiffs are put to strict proof thereof. The defendants in particular deny that they ordered the timber from the plaintiffs for which the plaintiffs are now claiming or that the plaintiffs can claim interest or at all.

The plaintiffs in February 1984 took out O. 14 proceedings and exhibited inter alia what was purported to be the actual orders placed by the defendants for the goods. It was alleged that on delivery of the goods acknowledgment of receipt thereof was made on the dupl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top