INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
ELANGESHWARAN MUTHUSAMY – Appellant
Versus
ANSELL NP SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claimant's dismissal and request for document production. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. company's opposition to production based on relevance and existence. (Para 3 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. claims about evidence related to dismissal. (Para 6) |
| 4. court's findings on document relevance and the burden of proof. (Para 12) |
[1] This reference stems from the dismissal of the Claimant by the Company on 27 July 2015. The first mention date for the case was fixed on 25 May 2016 and then followed with several other dates for mention. On 11 August 2016, the Court fixed 12-13 July 2017 for hearing and another date for case management was fixed on 13 June 2017. When the case was ready to proceed for hearing on 12 July 2017, the counsel for the Company raised his objection on the request of the Claimant mentioned in Borang P to be produced. Primarily, as argued by the Claimant, the documents requested to be produced were closely inter-related to the Claimant's case in this Court.
[2] The documents are as follows:
(i) Monthly Financial Closure Report for the period January 2013 till December 2015;
(ii) Monthly Internal Audit Report for the period January 2013 till December 2015;
(iii) External Audit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.