FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ULIMAS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
HI-SUMMIT CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of multiple appeals and main questions of law. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. initial suit details and key objections raised. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. discussion over authority to act and legal representation. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. authority and ratification principles discussed. (Para 9) |
[1] There are three appeals before this court namely:
(i) Civil Appeal No: 02(I)-21-03-2014(W) with Ulimas Sdn Bhd as the appellant (the 1st appellant) and Hi-Summit Construction Sdn Bhd as the respondent;
(ii) Civil Appeal No: 02(I)-22-03-2014(W) with Bright Focus Sdn Bhd as the appellant (the 2nd appellant) and Hi-Summit Construction Sdn Bhd as the respondent; and
(iii) Civil Appeal No: 02(I)-28-03-2014(W) with Konsortium Lapangan Terjaya Sdn Bhd as the appellant (the 3rd appellant) and Hi-Summit Construction Sdn Bhd as the respondent.
For convenience, in this judgment the three appellants will be collectively referred as "the appellants".
[2] Leave to appeal was granted by this court on 25 February 2014. The questions of law posed to us are as follows:
(i) Where unauthorised legal proceedings are not ratified or adopted by a principal sooner than striking out by a court of law, does the doctrin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.