SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 MarsdenLR 469

COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
SRI INAI (PULAU PINANG) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
YONG YIT SWEE & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Jagdeep Singh Deo,Karpal Singh ,Respondent Advocate: M Thayalan

JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA:

The Facts

[1] In the early hours of the morning of 16 February 1989 a fire broke out in the building at No. 1, Park Road, Penang. It claimed several lives and caused serious injury to others. They were all young children. We will say in a moment how they came to be there.

[2] For convenience, we will refer to the parties to this appeal by the title assigned to each of them in the court of first instance.

[3] The first defendant is a school. It has a campus in Penang. It needed a hostel to accommodate some of its students there. It found a building: a very old dwelling house. According to the unchallenged evidence, the building had been in existence even before 1922.

[4] The second defendant is a local authority. It owned the building in question. It let the old building out to the first defendant. It knew very well the use to which the first defendant would put the building. It knew that young children would live in that old building. But it did nothing to upgrade the building to ensure that it was safe for use as a hostel by young children. That much is borne out by the evidence. And there is no serious dispute about this.

[5] In all the letting was for three

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top