INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
KESATUAN PEKERJA-PEKERJA PERKAYUAN SEMENANJUNG MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
STAEDTLER (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD – Respondent
CONSENT AWARD
1. This is a reference under section 26(2) of the Act arising out of a trade dispute between the Union and the Company pertaining to the C.A.
2. The Court fixed four mention dates to enable parties to file in their respective pleadings and bundles of documents. The Court had at the same time encouraged parties to try to settle the dispute amicably. The Court then fixed five more mention dates to enable the parties to have time to negotiate.
3. On 26 September 2008, when the matter was called up for mention, the learned counsel for the Company handed over copies of the C.A. duly signed by the parties and prayed for a consent award be handed down. The Court notes that the C.A. also contains 2 letters of Undertaking and a Joint Agreement. In one of the letters of Undertaking, the parties had agreed to extend the C.A. upon its expiry for a further period of 24 months with effect from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2010.
4. In the premises, and by consent of the parties, the C.A. shall be as hereby attached.
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
STAEDTLER (MALAYSIA) BERHAD
(TEMERLUH, PAHANG)
AND
TIMBER EMPLOYEES UNION
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
01ST JANUARY 2006 | - | 31ST DECEMBER 2008 |
COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.