SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 2889

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PERWIRA AFFIN BANK BHD – Appellant
Versus
SARDAR MOHD ROSHAN KHAN & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Low Hop Bing JCA:

Appeals

[1] The appellant-defendant ("the bank") has filed two related appeals against two separate decisions of the learned judge of the Kuala Lumpur High Court. These appeals are:

Appeal No Decision Appealed Against

(1) W-02-586-08 The bank's application, which sought to set aside the judgment dated 27 July 2007 given for the respondent- plaintiff ("the customer"), was dismissed with costs.

(2) W-02-722-07 Judgment with costs was given for the customer on 27 July 2007.

[2] By consent of the parties, Appeal No (1) was heard first, as the outcome thereof would have a direct bearing on Appeal No (2).

[3] On 20 February 2009, we allowed these two appeals with costs, set aside the judgment given for the customer and ordered the deposits to be refunded to the bank. We now give our grounds.

Factual Background

[4] The customer was the sole proprietor of Omar Khayam Enterprise.

[5] The bank had granted banking facilities to the customer.

[6] On 4 March 1999, by way of a writ action vide Kuala Lumpur High Court Civil Suit No. 2-22-155-1999, the customer sought to recover a sum of RM233,155 with interest, on the basis of the bank's negligence and/or breach of contract.

1

[7] Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top