UNITED ALLIED EMPIRE SDN BHD vs PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN SELANGOR & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 MarsdenLR 1516

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
UNITED ALLIED EMPIRE SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN SELANGOR & ORS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Rosli Dahlan,Bahari Yeow,Miss Ho Ai Ting ,Respondent Advocate: Naziah Mokhtar

Table of Content
1. overview of the acquisition process and the appellant's initial application for jr. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details on the judicial commissioner's dismissal of the jr. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. identification of issues raised by the appellant. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
4. focus on mandatory requirements under the land acquisition act. (Para 11 , 12 , 15 , 16)
5. court's view on the illegality of the acquisition due to non-issuance of form a. (Para 17 , 19 , 21)
6. discussion on fundamental issues regarding procedural impropriety. (Para 18 , 20)
7. illustration of binding precedents and their applicability. (Para 24 , 25)
8. final conclusion on the acquiescence of the erroneous decision and the outcome of the appeal. (Para 31 , 45)

[1] The salient facts of this case are as follows. The United Allied Empire Sdn Bhd ("the appellant") owned a 26-acre development project land ("the said land") and had voluntarily reserved a part of that said land measuring slightly less than an acre for the expansion of an existing mosque "Masjid Ar-Ridwan" on the site.

[2] The said land had since become the subject of a land acquisition exercise by the Pengarah Tanah dan Galian Selangor (1st respondent), Penta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 MarsdenLR 1516

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAUNITED ALLIED EMPIRE SDN BHD – AppellantVersusPENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN SELANGOR & ORS – Respondent

Cases Referred (2)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
UNITED ALLIED EMPIRE SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENGARAH TANAH DAN GALIAN SELANGOR & ORS – Respondent