SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 MarsdenLR 1014

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PAGAL MIDZFAR ABDUHARI – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Hamida Ambo ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Amril Johari

JUDGMENT

Mariana Yahya JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant (Pagal Midzfar Abduhari, the Accused) appealing on the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court on 10 March 2022. Following the trial, the Appellant was found guilty of an offence under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Act 1952 (" DDA 1952") and sentenced to death under s 39B (2) of the same Act.

[2] The Appellant was charged under s 39B(1)(a) of the DDA 1952 for drug trafficking, to wit, 50.30 grams of Methamphetamine. The Appellant pleaded not guilty to the charge and went for a full trial before the learned High Court Judge ("learned HCJ").

[3] At the conclusion of the trial, the learned HCJ convicted and sentenced the Appellant under the said charge.

[4] Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence, the Appellant appealed to this Court.

The Appeal Before Us

[5] The issues raised in this appeal, as stated in the Petition of Appeal, revolve around the element of possession and trafficking. At the appeal hearing, the learned counsel for the appellant informed this Court that the appellant would like to withdraw the appeal regarding the conviction held by the trial Court. The appellant will proceed with th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top