COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
SRI KELADI SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
BUKIT OUG CONDOMINIUM JOINT MANAGEMENT BODY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
[1] The dispute in this case is about who has the right to some car parks. The High Court decided these car parks as common property where the respondent has the right to ownership and therefore the right to manage. Aggrieved by the decision of the High Court ("HC"), the appellant came before us for the appeal against that decision.
Background Facts
[2] The appellant is a housing developer and the respondent is a joint management body. The appellant developed 6 blocks of condominiums ("the development") known as Bukit OUG Condominium, comprising 1,536 residential parcels and 74 commercial parcels. Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur approved the building plans and layout plans for the appellant. The respondent is entrusted to manage the common property of the development.
[3] The development was completed in stages and vacant possession was delivered for the residential parcels.
[4] The appellant was subsequently wound-up. Liquidators were then appointed for the appellant.
[5] The liquidators conducted an audit exercise with the parcel owners of the development and found 149 surplus and unaccounted car parks.
[6] In order to realise the appellant's assets,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.