SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 MarsdenLR 143

JUDGMENT

Suffian LP:

I am dealing with this matter sitting in the High Court. The applicants were and are jointly charged in Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court Case MSA No. 1460 of 1977 with an offence under s. 12(2) and punishable under s. 12(3) read together with s. 39(A) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance No. 30 of 1952.

Before being charged, each of them had made a "cautioned statement" to the Police under s. 113 of the Criminal Procedure Code .

On 28 September 1978, their Counsel Mr. Joginder Singh applied to the President, Sessions Court, for an order that the Prosecutor supply him a certified copy of the cautioned statements of the applicants. The learned President made no order and advised the applicants to apply to the High Court for a ruling.

On 29 September 1978, Mr. Joginder Singh wrote to the Ketua Police, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, respondent, asking for copies of the cautioned statements "so that our Counsel could prepare our defence to the said charges".

The respondent refused to supply the copies. His letter dated 6 October 1978, stated:

As you are aware, the question of supplying the cautioned statements has been argued in Court when the learned President

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top