SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 2294

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
KERAJAAN MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
PERWIRA BINTANG HOLDINGS SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of arbitration context and parties (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. high court's decision on setting aside parts of the award (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
3. high court's decision summary on award challenge. (Para 7)
4. discussion on policy considerations and legal grounds (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. underlying facts regarding claim for extra payment (Para 15 , 16 , 20)
6. court's findings regarding arbitrator's jurisdiction and errors (Para 22 , 24 , 39 , 40 , 61)

[1] The subject matter of this appeal is an arbitration award which was challenged by the present respondent, Perwira Bintang Holdings Sdn Bhd, in the High Court on the basis of s 37(1)(a)(iv), 37(2)(b) and 37(3) of the Arbitration Act 2005 ("the Act") to set aside identified paragraphs in the Final Award dated 24 October 2012 ("the Award"). Altogether, the application under s 37 of the Act was to set aside ten paragraphs in the Award. These paragraphs are paras 117, 118, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 139 and 140. As a further and alternative prayer, Perwira Bintang Holdings Sdn Bhd also applied to set aside or vary in part, or in whole, the Award under s 42 of the Act.

[2] The arbitration concerned a domestic arbitrati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top