SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1812

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MACHINCHANG SKYWAYS SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA PEMBANGUNAN LANGKAWI & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Harpal Singh Grewal,CK Lim,Reny Rao ,Respondent Advocate: Karin Lim,Shamshul Jamil

Table of Content
1. parties and legal agreements background (Para 1)

[1] Both appeals were filed by the appellants/plaintiffs against the decision of the High Court at Alor Setar in allowing the respondents/defendants' application under O 14A and/or O 33 of the Rules of the High ('RHC') 1980, which resulted in the appellants/plaintiffs' action being struck out and judgment entered for the 1st respondent/1st defendant's counterclaim. We heard both appeals together and had dismissed the same. For ease of reference, in this judgment, the parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court and any reference to the Appeal Record will be the Record for Appeal No: K-02(IM)-2716 November 2012.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top