Back
HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK SRI AMAN
LIM KEK PING & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
THAI WAH CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs claim trespass and nuisance. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court orders temporary measures for plaintiffs. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. defendants deny liability and blame plaintiffs. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. witnesses examined to support each party's arguments. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. court evaluates trespass and nuisance claims. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. court analyzes impacts of water drainage. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. plaintiffs' land condition and duties considered. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. court outlines rights of higher vs lower landowners. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 9. discussion on water flow rights established. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 10. examination of statutory authority defense. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 11. addressed plaintiffs' need for statutory remedies. (Para 54 , 55) |
| 12. court's conclusion and remedies proposed. (Para 56 , 57) |
| 13. damages awarded and counterclaims dismissed. (Para 58) |
[1] This was a suit founded on trespass and nuisance by the husbandand wife co-owners of a parcel of land against their neighbours who are ahousing development company and three owners of several
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
