SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 412

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LEE CHYE YEN & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
EONENET.COM SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of copyright infringement case. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned High Court Judge dated 31 December 2012, after full trial, whereby the respondent's claim for infringement of copyright works against the appellants (defendants) was allowed with costs.

Facts Of The Case

[2] The respondent (who was the plaintiff at the Court below) at all material times, was a company incorporated in Malaysia on 20 October 1999. The respondent claimed that it was one of the pioneers in Internet Marketing Seminar and Internet Marketing Coaching in Malaysia and Hong Kong and was also an expert in search engine optimisation.

[3] The 1st and 2nd appellants (who were the defendants at the Court below) are sisters, and also partners of a business known as Ebiz Solution Network with an address at Bandar Bukit Tinggi in Klang, Selangor.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top