MAZNI IBRAHIM V.ROSAIDY EFFANDY DARI TETUAN KHAIRIL & CO

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2012 MarsdenLR 1010

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
MAZNI IBRAHIM V.ROSAIDY EFFANDY DARI TETUAN KHAIRIL & CO

Table of Content
1. appeal from high court decision. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. preliminary objection raised against the motion. (Para 5)
3. high court dismisses the motion based on non-compliance. (Para 6 , 7)
4. misconduct related to professional responsibility. (Para 8)
5. efforts to include additional records in the appeal. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. court examines additional documents submitted. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. discussion on merits of the additional evidence. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. respondent raises defects in the record of appeal. (Para 18)

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant Mazni Binti Ibrahim from the decision of the High Court at Shah Alam

At The High Court

[2] The appellant had applied by originating motion at the High Court for orders as follows:

i) Bahawa keputusan Lembaga Tatatertib Peguam-Peguam bertarikh 9 Disember 2011 menolak aduan pihak pemohon dibawah s 103D Akta Profession Guaman 1976 hendaklah diketepikan;

ii) Responden telah melakukan salahlaku semasa mengendalikan kes yang melibatkan pemohon di dalam tindakan Saman Pemula No MT3-24-1872-2008;

iii) Kos permohonan ini dibayar oleh responden;

iv) Lain-lain relif yang mahkamah yang mulia ini fikirkan adil dan suaimanfa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2012 MarsdenLR 1010

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYAMAZNI IBRAHIM V.ROSAIDY EFFANDY DARI TETUAN KHAIRIL & CO

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
MAZNI IBRAHIM V.ROSAIDY EFFANDY DARI TETUAN KHAIRIL & CO