HAROLD FERNANDEZ SEBASTIAN WILFRED FERNANDEZ vs SYARIKAT PENDIDIKAN STAFFIELD BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Table of Content
1. commendation for counsel's submissions and factual background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. judicial standards regarding burden of proof in misconduct cases. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. definition and implications of sexual harassment. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. determining credibility in harassment cases. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
5. similar fact evidence admissibility standards. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
6. reformulated standards for similar fact evidence. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
7. principles of a fair domestic inquiry. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
8. arguments regarding procedural impropriety. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
9. claimant's objections and contentions against inquiry. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
10. challenging the conduct of the inquiry. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
11. examine the implications of procedural fairness. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
12. discussion of the fairness in evidentiary assessment. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61)
13. fairness in assessing witness testimony. (Para 62 , 63)
14. claimant's credibility and the burden of proof. (Para 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69)
15. evidence from investigations must support charges.